-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Rollup of 6 pull requests #139147
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #139147
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
this uses some # directives to make sure the code works on x86_64, and does not produce errors on other platforms
Before: let a = StructWithSomeFields{ field_1: 1, field_2: 2, field_3: 3, field_4: 4, field_5: 5, field_6: 6,}; let a = StructWithSomeFields{ field_1: 1, field_2: 2, ..a}; After: let a = StructWithSomeFields { field_1: 1, field_2: 2, field_3: 3, field_4: 4, field_5: 5, field_6: 6 }; let a = StructWithSomeFields { field_1: 1, field_2: 2, ..a };
…one, r=onur-ozkan bootstrap: Avoid cloning `change-id` list Inspired by [recent discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/Collecting.20some.20Real.20Configs.20for.20testing/near/507845657) on the bootstrap `change-id` field, I took a look at the code and found this little optimization. It does not change behavior.
…errors Properly document FakeReads
…-check-block, r=GuillaumeGomez unstable book: in a sanitizer example, check the code Use some `#` directives to make sure the code checks on x86_64, and does not produce errors on other platforms. This example still used an older version of `#[naked]`, and because the snippet was ignored that was missed before. I'm not sure when this gets built on CI exactly, so it might be worthwhile to try and build it for a non-x86_64 architecture to make sure that works. I'm not sure how to verify locally that e.g. on aarch64 this code works without errors/warnings.
…rors Remove attribute `#[rustc_error]` It was an ancient way to write `check-pass` tests, but now it's no longer necessary (except for the `delayed_bug_from_inside_query` flavor, which is retained).
…iler-errors Improve hir_pretty for struct expressions. While working on rust-lang#139131 I noticed the hir pretty printer outputs an empty line between each field, and is also missing a space before the `{` and the `}`: ```rust let a = StructWithSomeFields{ field_1: 1, field_2: 2, field_3: 3, field_4: 4, field_5: 5, field_6: 6,}; let a = StructWithSomeFields{ field_1: 1, field_2: 2, ..a}; ``` This changes it to: ```rust let a = StructWithSomeFields { field_1: 1, field_2: 2, field_3: 3, field_4: 4, field_5: 5, field_6: 6 }; let a = StructWithSomeFields { field_1: 1, field_2: 2, ..a }; ```
Switch some rustc_on_unimplemented uses to diagnostic::on_unimplemented The use on the SliceIndex impl appears unreachable, there is no mention of "vector indices" in any test output and I could not get it to show up in error messages.
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2025
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#139044 (bootstrap: Avoid cloning `change-id` list) - rust-lang#139111 (Properly document FakeReads) - rust-lang#139113 (unstable book: in a sanitizer example, check the code) - rust-lang#139122 (Remove attribute `#[rustc_error]`) - rust-lang#139132 (Improve hir_pretty for struct expressions.) - rust-lang#139141 (Switch some rustc_on_unimplemented uses to diagnostic::on_unimplemented) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
PG-exploit-mitigations
Project group: Exploit mitigations
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
change-id
list #139044 (bootstrap: Avoid cloningchange-id
list)#[rustc_error]
#139122 (Remove attribute#[rustc_error]
)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup